CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL · FINANCE LEADERSHIP
April 2026

Finance
Cycle 25-26

Department Review

A focused view of the Finance team's performance across Cycle 25-26 — individual results, competency profiles, and how the team positions relative to the broader PI AgSciences Brazil benchmark.

3
Team members
3.63
Department mean
3.88
Top rating
6
Competencies
01 · Department Overview

Finance at a glance.

How the team is delivering across Cycle 25-26 — the shape of performance, the strongest competencies, and how the department positions in the broader company context.

Department mean
3.63/ 5.00
σ = 0.30 · n = 3
Exceeds (≥4.0)
0
Top-quartile contributors
Meets (3.0–4.0)
3
Solid delivery backbone
Positioning
105.8%
of company mean · above company pace
Where Finance sits vs. the company
Visual comparison of average Overall rating. Each dot is anonymized — no individual comparison, just the team's general position.
1.02.03.04.05.0
Company
3.43
Finance
3.63
BuildingApproachingMeetingExceeding

Overall Rating distribution

Where Finance team members land on the rating scale.

0
0.0
0
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.5
0
2.0
0
2.5
1
3.0
2
3.5
0
4.0
0
4.5

Competency strengths

Finance profile ranked from strongest to weakest competency.

01 Teamwork
Dept
4.33
Company
3.67
118% of company
02 Problem Solving
Dept
4.00
Company
3.61
111% of company
03 Adaptability
Dept
4.00
Company
3.47
115% of company
04 Customer Service
Dept
3.67
Company
3.61
102% of company
05 Planning & Organization
Dept
3.67
Company
3.50
105% of company
06 Communications
Dept
2.33
Company
3.31
70% of company
02 · Team

Every review, one card.

Click any card for the full profile — competencies, goals, job duties, narrative comments, and general information including current compensation.

KR

Karina Zacher Raibolt

Accounting and Financial Coordinator
Finance
TOP IN DEPT
3.88
3.50 G 4.00 JD 4.00 C
113% of company mean
EA

Emerson do Valle Augusto

Credit & Collection Manager
Finance
3.71
3.50 G 4.00 JD 3.67 C
108% of company mean
MA

Milena Barbosa Jesus do Amaral

Supply Chain Coordinator
Finance
3.29
3.50 G 3.00 JD 3.33 C
96% of company mean
03 · Positioning

How each team member sits in context.

For each person: where they land on the 1–5 rating scale, with reference lines for Finance mean (solid colored line) and Company mean (dashed grey). The % value shows proximity to the company average — not a ranking. The goal is context, not competition.

Finance mean (3.63)
Company mean (3.43)
Individual rating
KR
Karina Zacher Raibolt
Accounting and Financial Coordinator
3.88
113%
of company avg
EA
Emerson do Valle Augusto
Credit & Collection Manager
3.71
108%
of company avg
MA
Milena Barbosa Jesus do Amaral
Supply Chain Coordinator
3.29
96%
of company avg
💡 How to read this A proximity of 100% means the person is right at the company average. Above 100% indicates delivery above the company-wide benchmark, below 100% indicates ratings below it. This is not a judgment — it is calibration context. The distribution of the Finance team naturally produces a mix above and below the company mean.